[1] Hot cognition was initially proposed in 1963 by Robert P. Abelson. Too Hot to Handle: Examining Hot and Cold Emotional States on the Predictors of Blood Donor Intentions and Behaviour Author: Rebekah Clowes Abstract. The empathy gap occurs because we underestimate how much emotions impact the decisions that we make, causing us to leave emotions out of the equation when making predictions. They are presented with four decks of cards that represent either a gain or loss in money. An example of a biased decision caused by hot cognition would be a juror disregarding evidence because of an attraction to the defendant.[1]. Participants answered these questions in one of two groups. The first group answered these questions immediately before partaking in 20 minutes of cardiovascular exercise, while the other group answered the questions immediately after engaging in 20 minutes of cardiovascular exercise. [10] This lends support to the idea that hot cognition may follow a separate, and perhaps delayed, developmental trajectory as opposed to cold cognition. [1] Hot cognition contrasts with cold cognition, which implies cognitive processing of information that is independent of emotional involvement. A cold flash is a tingling, shivery, cold feeling that can suddenly come over your body. Temperament, Mood and Emotion: Emotional states of different duration and cause. Hot cognition is a hypothesis on motivated reasoning in which a person's thinking is influenced by their emotional state. For example, if we receive an email from our boss that makes us very angry, we may send a nasty email back, not considering that our anger would likely eventually subside, and this can have negative consequences on our job. Decision making with cold cognition is more likely to involve logic and critical analysis. In the study participants were shown movie clips in order to induce a mood of happiness, anger or sadness and asked to complete a decision-making task. Just ask any woman who has broken free from an abusive relationship and started to heal. You would be in a hot mental state and powerful emotions may influence how you behave. Put simply, hot cognition is cognition coloured by emotion. For example, when one is angry, it is difficult to understand what it is like for one to be calm, and vice versa; when one is blindly in love with someone, it is difficult … Emotions We arrive at the truth, not by the reason only, but also by the heart.-- Blaise Pascal. In a cold state, the women forecast they would be angry. After being asked to describe how they believed the hikers would feel, the participants were also asked questions to make predictions about the hikers’ hunger and thirst. The empathy gap is also a problem when it comes to our ability to understand the perspective of others, which can lead to conflict. When we are calm and collected (cold), we act more rationally and plan our actions. For their study, Loewenstein and Bowen hypothesized that people would project their own visceral state onto others, thereby allowing their emotions to influence their prediction of other’s behavior.4 In the experiment, participants were asked to predict the feelings of hikers that had gotten lost in the woods without food or water, and how they themselves would feel if they were the hikers. ‘Hot’ visceral states are when our mental state is influenced by hunger, sexual desire, fear, exhaustion, or other strong emotions. Researchers found that participants in the negative mood condition used more non-compensatory, specific decision-making techniques by focusing on the details of the situation. if(wpruag()){document.write("
Autorská tvorba